https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/ecoinfo/favicon.ico?14691340362005-09-12T22:28:32ZEcoinformatics RedmineSEEK - Bug #2194: Revise resultset.xsd in ecogridhttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/2194?journal_id=74952005-09-12T22:28:32ZMatt Jonesjones@nceas.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><p>Actually, I think we agreed it makes more sense to remove the namespace<br /><strong>element</strong> and keep the namespace <strong>attribute</strong> that is par tof recordStructure,<br />because it accurately reflects how to interpret the recordStructure fields. We<br />also need to decide what to do with the id field, and whether its use is<br />required, or whether people can continue using "name" attributes in the<br />returnfield elements of their records.</p>
<p>We also agreed that recordStructure would have cardinality 1:1, containing 0 or<br />more returnFields. Maybe we should state that there should never be a<br />returnfield in the record elements that is not listed in the recordStructure?</p> SEEK - Bug #2194: Revise resultset.xsd in ecogridhttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/2194?journal_id=74962005-11-29T19:50:13ZMatt Jonesjones@nceas.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><p>Done. Full changes are in the axis-only-branch and will be merged with the<br />trunk soon.</p> SEEK - Bug #2194: Revise resultset.xsd in ecogridhttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/2194?journal_id=74972013-03-27T21:19:25ZRedmine Admin
<ul></ul><p>Original Bugzilla ID was 2194</p>