https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/ecoinfo/favicon.ico?14691340362006-11-01T14:48:37ZEcoinformatics RedmineInfoVeg - Bug #2636: Better labels for ambiguous occurrenceshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/2636?journal_id=90822006-11-01T14:48:37ZRobert Peetpeet@unc.edu
<ul></ul><p>Peter White writes:<br />I wonder if it should be Carya glabra AND/OR Carya ovalis. If the <br />record is based on lumping, but splitting is the standard, couldn't both <br />taxa be present in a county? That is, a county dot map represents more <br />than one specimen. Obviously one specimen has almost never two species, <br />except when a collector has mounted two twigs on one sheet thinking they <br />are the same, but they are not (I have seen this myself).</p>
<p>RKP responds:<br />Good idea. I think this expresses the situation more clearly.</p>
<p>However, I have some concerns.<br />1. AND/OR takes up more valuable real estate.<br />2. Maps are from the perspective of a single taxon, so we don't really care if both are present in the county -- that can be deduced from looking at the other map.</p>
<p>Let's see if Xianhua thinks there is space enough. Could get complex with something like Andropogon virginicus where several taxa have to be concatinated for the ambiguous Radford counties.</p> InfoVeg - Bug #2636: Better labels for ambiguous occurrenceshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/2636?journal_id=90832007-03-14T01:08:50Zxianhua liurobertliu325@yahoo.com
<ul></ul><p>I guess this issue has been resolved by listing individual sources for ambiguous records instead of lumping them in one group.</p> InfoVeg - Bug #2636: Better labels for ambiguous occurrenceshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/2636?journal_id=90842007-03-31T17:03:30ZRobert Peetpeet@unc.edu
<ul></ul><p>fixed</p> InfoVeg - Bug #2636: Better labels for ambiguous occurrenceshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/2636?journal_id=90852013-03-27T21:20:50ZRedmine Admin
<ul></ul><p>Original Bugzilla ID was 2636</p>