https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/ecoinfo/favicon.ico?14691340362008-04-16T23:25:18ZEcoinformatics RedmineEML - Bug #3227: gRing is declared as GRingPointTypehttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/3227?journal_id=110692008-04-16T23:25:18ZMatt Jonesjones@nceas.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><p>Yes, this is a bug and is basically unusable in its current state. Changing the type definition as you suggest would allow either syntax to be used to delineate the gring. Lets go ahead and fold it into 2.1 RC3 if you are so inclined.</p> EML - Bug #3227: gRing is declared as GRingPointTypehttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/3227?journal_id=110702008-04-17T17:37:33ZMargaret O'Brienmob@msi.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><ul>
<li>Bug 3229 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</li>
</ul> EML - Bug #3227: gRing is declared as GRingPointTypehttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/3227?journal_id=110712008-09-22T17:10:20ZMargaret O'Brienmob@msi.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><p>changing status to "fixed"</p> EML - Bug #3227: gRing is declared as GRingPointTypehttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/3227?journal_id=110722008-11-07T00:09:14ZMargaret O'Brienmob@msi.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><p>One other note:<br />The switch of GRing to GRingType was made months ago and this bug closed.<br />But I just noticed that GRing was a complexType that was completely empty, although the documentation states that it should have string content. It has been changed to simpleType in EML2.1. Probably this was never noticed in the past since this type was never used. I'm only putting a note here since it's related to the retyping of GRing.</p> EML - Bug #3227: gRing is declared as GRingPointTypehttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/3227?journal_id=110732013-03-27T21:22:42ZRedmine Admin
<ul></ul><p>Original Bugzilla ID was 3227</p>