https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/ecoinfo/favicon.ico?14691340362001-12-01T00:37:03ZEcoinformatics RedmineEML - Bug #336: need formal defs for responsible party roleshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/336?journal_id=11292001-12-01T00:37:03ZMatt Jonesjones@nceas.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><p>This should be done with the rest of the EML documentation review as found in<br />bug # 338.</p> EML - Bug #336: need formal defs for responsible party roleshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/336?journal_id=11302002-02-05T01:48:09ZMatt Jonesjones@nceas.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><p>Chnaging target milestone for the major EML bugs to Beta7, which is scheduled<br />for early to mid March for release. There are likely other bugs that need to be<br />entered and resolved for this Beta7 release as well, so lets generate a complete<br />list!</p> EML - Bug #336: need formal defs for responsible party roleshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/336?journal_id=11312002-02-15T01:19:27ZMatt Jonesjones@nceas.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><p>I think we need to carefully consider this list, and possibly revise it. We<br />originally chose it to correspond to the ISO role codes, but what is important<br />is that the various roles are 1) understandable, 2) exclusive (more or less),<br />and 3) comprehensive. If they can't be comprehensive, then we need to consider<br />making it an extensible domain instead of constraining it to these values.</p>
<p>No matter what we need to precisely define each of the roles that we decide to keep.</p> EML - Bug #336: need formal defs for responsible party roleshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/336?journal_id=11322002-05-14T18:20:17ZMatt Jonesjones@nceas.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><p>This list is now not part of the standard ResponsibleParty. It has been kept in<br />case some elements want to create a role element. It has been extended so that,<br />in addition to the enumerated values, any string can also be provided. We still<br />may want to consider removing it alltogether.</p> EML - Bug #336: need formal defs for responsible party roleshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/336?journal_id=11332002-06-14T02:03:32ZMatt Jonesjones@nceas.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><p>List has been kept, and the list is just a set of suggested terms, but the user<br />is free to put anything in the role elements. The important roles have been<br />broken out as individual elements. FIXED.</p> EML - Bug #336: need formal defs for responsible party roleshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/336?journal_id=11342013-03-27T21:14:00ZRedmine Admin
<ul></ul><p>Original Bugzilla ID was 336</p>