https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/ecoinfo/favicon.ico?14691340362002-02-05T01:48:11ZEcoinformatics RedmineEML - Bug #339: bounding box vs point data in eml-coveragehttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/339?journal_id=11442002-02-05T01:48:11ZMatt Jonesjones@nceas.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><p>Chnaging target milestone for the major EML bugs to Beta7, which is scheduled<br />for early to mid March for release. There are likely other bugs that need to be<br />entered and resolved for this Beta7 release as well, so lets generate a complete<br />list!</p> EML - Bug #339: bounding box vs point data in eml-coveragehttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/339?journal_id=11452002-03-22T18:59:28ZChad Berkleyberkley@nceas.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><p>made westbc and southbc optional so now if you want to define a single point, you can just use northbc and eastbc.</p> EML - Bug #339: bounding box vs point data in eml-coveragehttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/339?journal_id=11462013-03-27T21:14:01ZRedmine Admin
<ul></ul><p>Original Bugzilla ID was 339</p>