https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/ecoinfo/favicon.ico?14691340362002-05-02T01:13:12ZEcoinformatics RedmineEML - Bug #498: check root element names for consistencyhttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/498?journal_id=17442002-05-02T01:13:12ZMatt Jonesjones@nceas.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><p>Looking at Corinna's notes, she says we decided to keep the "eml" but remove the<br />"-", so that root elements would be of the form: "emlLiterature". Does that<br />mean that we have "emlDataTable", contrary to what the bug for eml-entity says<br />we decided (dataTable)?</p> EML - Bug #498: check root element names for consistencyhttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/498?journal_id=17452002-05-10T20:43:37ZChad Berkleyberkley@nceas.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><p>Unless anyone has objections, I'm going to change all of the roots to just use<br />camel notation without the eml. For instance tableEntity not emlTableEntity and<br />not eml-tableEntity. If there are any objections tell me by Monday. I'll make<br />the changes on Tuesday to give people time to respond.</p> EML - Bug #498: check root element names for consistencyhttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/498?journal_id=17462002-05-20T20:40:47ZChad Berkleyberkley@nceas.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><p>changed all roots to just the name of the file without eml- using camelCaps<br />where appropriate. I'm unsure what to do with eml-literature because the root<br />is currently called 'citation' instead of 'literature'. Should I change it?</p> EML - Bug #498: check root element names for consistencyhttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/498?journal_id=17472002-06-14T01:53:16ZMatt Jonesjones@nceas.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><p>ok, checked and fixed. In CVS.</p> EML - Bug #498: check root element names for consistencyhttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/498?journal_id=17482013-03-27T21:14:28ZRedmine Admin
<ul></ul><p>Original Bugzilla ID was 498</p>