https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/ecoinfo/favicon.ico?14691340362002-10-25T19:58:08ZEcoinformatics RedmineEML - Bug #655: need better model for numeric domains for attributeshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/655?journal_id=22082002-10-25T19:58:08ZPeter McCartneypeter.mccartney@asu.edu
<ul></ul><p>Does this belong in numeric domain or in measurement scale? seems like it<br />qualifies measuremnt scale rather than domain.</p> EML - Bug #655: need better model for numeric domains for attributeshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/655?journal_id=22092002-10-30T20:27:41ZMatt Jonesjones@nceas.ucsb.edu
<ul></ul><p>DONE. Both number type and the exclusive options are now part of the domain<br />expression. This allows precise numeric domain statements. We decided that it<br />did not belong in measurementScale as it is an aspect of the domain. Because<br />domain is part of measurementScale, you can only use these numeric domain<br />constructs on interval and ratio scale attributes.</p> EML - Bug #655: need better model for numeric domains for attributeshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/655?journal_id=22102013-03-27T21:14:55ZRedmine Admin
<ul></ul><p>Original Bugzilla ID was 655</p>