EML: Issueshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/ecoinfo/favicon.ico?14691340362002-10-31T16:00:07ZEcoinformatics Redmine
Redmine Bug #661 (Resolved): spell check eml-attribute.xsd and synchronize with unitDictionaryhttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/6612002-10-31T16:00:07ZTim Bergsmatbergsma@kbs.msu.edu
<p>eml-attribute has typos, such as filed for file and mailnly for mainly. Also, <br />the unitDictionary contains errors that were fixed in eml-unitDictionary, such <br />as british thermal unit for britishThermalUnit.</p> Bug #626 (Resolved): ProcedureStepType schema needs revision to protect sequence of descriptions.https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/6262002-10-11T19:34:12ZTim Bergsmatbergsma@kbs.msu.edu
<p>As of RC2, the schema for ProcedureStepType is such that protocol replaces, <br />rather than qualifies, description. I think the choice of (description or <br />(citation or protocol) should be a sequence of description (one), citation <br />(zero to many) and protocol (zero to many); or something to that effect.</p> Bug #625 (Resolved): Cardinality regarding eml-methods should be corrected in two places.https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/6252002-10-09T19:48:41ZTim Bergsmatbergsma@kbs.msu.edu
<p>eml-dataset has an optional child element methods with the cardinality zero-or-<br />ONE. It should be zero-to-MANY. A dataset may be qualifed by more than one <br />corpus of methodological effort, and it cannot be assumed that those efforts <br />form a single logically and temporally continuous sequence of methodStep. <br />Also, methods itself should be a SEQUENCE, not a CHOICE, of methodStep (itself <br />repeatable), sampling (optional), or qualityControl (optional). It is an error <br />to present a choice of optional elements.</p> Bug #595 (Resolved): DescriptorTypehttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/5952002-09-18T19:18:34ZTim Bergsmatbergsma@kbs.msu.edu
<p>eml-project.xsd has a DescriptorType. Since it is not (?) used anywhere in <br />this file, I'm guessing it's not used in eml, and should be dropped.</p> Bug #594 (Resolved): change cardinality for designDescription and studyAreaDescriptionhttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/5942002-09-18T18:51:06ZTim Bergsmatbergsma@kbs.msu.edu
<p>In researchProject, it is apparently possible to create any number of <br />designDescriptions, each of which contain any number of descriptions of type <br />TextType. I can see why someone might want to have more than one description, <br />but I see no reason why someone would want to group these into more than one <br />designDescription, UNLESS he/she could also specify some OTHER attribute of <br />that group, such as a name.</p>
<p>I think that the cardinality of designDescription should be zero or one.<br />I think that the cardinality of studyAreaDesign should be zero or one, for the <br />same reason.</p>