FIRST: Issueshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/ecoinfo/favicon.ico?14691340362010-03-31T03:12:09ZEcoinformatics Redmine
Redmine Bug #4918 (New): New feature request (inter-related multi-part questions)https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/49182010-03-31T03:12:09ZSandeep Namilikondasandeep.namilikonda@gmail.com
<p>A multi-part question can sometimes be framed in such a way that the answer <br />to an earlier part could serve as the basis for the subsequent parts (questions).<br />Two issues can be thought off.<br />a) Does each part need to have the text corresponding to all the preceding parts<br /> in order to put the question in context?<br />b) When a user's search on the FIRST web interface returns specific assessment <br /> items (unlike the whole assessments being returned currently) and one of those<br /> items happens to be a part of a multi-part question, would it be possible for the<br /> user to be able to retrieve the related parts (and all the possible responses for<br /> inter-dependent parts, if need be) just by a click of a button?</p>
<p>Please list any potential solutions/suggestions as comments in reply to this report.</p> Bug #4917 (New): Parsed multi-part questions aren't saved/retrieved correctlyhttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/49172010-03-31T02:07:23ZSandeep Namilikondasandeep.namilikonda@gmail.com
<p>When the parser detects a multi-part question (or the user creates one), <br />it is saved without any errors popping up. But, when the assessment is re-opened<br />the multi-part is retrieved as separate single-part questions and the question text<br />was missing.</p> Bug #4875 (New): Unintended text displayed on EdMLDataviewContainerPanelhttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/48752010-03-10T23:34:12ZSandeep Namilikondasandeep.namilikonda@gmail.com
<p>When an assessment package is opened using the Morpho interface,<br />the "Data Package Documentation" page displays a script snippet<br />and a couple of non-functional icons:</p>
<p>script type="text/JavaScript" language="JavaScript"> insertTemplateOpening(''); insertSearchBox('');</p>
<p>Not a deal-breaker. It just has to be suppressed.</p> Bug #4726 (New): Re-sizing parser's main and original document windows froze the morpho applicationhttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/47262010-02-02T22:48:53ZSandeep Namilikondasandeep.namilikonda@gmail.com
<p>This bug is very specific to computers with certain limitations on computational<br />resources such as system memory being shared as video memory. At least, the<br />system on which this problem surfaced consistently had such a configuration.<br />Further details of the system specifications follow:</p>
<p>Toshiba laptop with AMD Turion X2 Mobile 1.6 GHz with 894 MB of RAM, ATI Radeon X1200, 128 MB video mem, VISTA O/S</p>
<p>This bug is only filed for documentation purposes currently.</p> Bug #4725 (New): Out of order question numbers can cause faulty question recognitionhttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/47252010-02-02T21:56:52ZSandeep Namilikondasandeep.namilikonda@gmail.com
<p>Exams with question numbers that are out of order (which may be caused due to<br />instructor adding or deleting questions from the original (word) document) can<br />make the parser merge multiple questions into one question.</p>
<p>We know that this behavior is a direct consequence of the pre-condition for our<br />question recognition algorithm to work!</p>
<p>Probably, in the next version, a more robust algorithm could be employed to<br />handle cases like the one above.</p> Bug #4391 (New): Current scheme of naming revisions of datapackages under Morpho seems faultyhttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/43912009-09-16T20:48:01ZSandeep Namilikondasandeep.namilikonda@gmail.com
<p>Suppose a data package has undergone a number of revisions, say v1 - v10.</p>
<p>Opening an older revision of an assessment, say v6, making a few changes<br />and saving it would overwrites the existing v7.</p>
<p>So, effectively, an older version has been overwritten. But, the latest revision<br />for that assessment in the list of data packages under Morpho is still v10. If you close and open the datapackage, it still opens v10, which is not the most current one (v7 is). <br />This behavior is counter intuitive.</p>
<p>Further, we notice that making changes to v6 and saving it as v7 automatically<br />disables revisions v8 and v9. This is in line with the expected behavior. Yet,<br />the latest revision getting a number v7 and overwriting the older copy of v7<br />should be deemed absolutely faulty. Ideally, v8, v9, and v10 should be <br />disabled/deleted or revisions to v6 should result in v11.</p> Bug #4146 (New): Allow for multiple responses (check all that apply) for MultipleChoiceResponseItemhttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/41462009-06-11T15:26:05ZRyan McFallmcfall@hope.edu
<p>In MultipleChoiceResponseItem.generateXML, there is a possibility of allowing multiple responses. However, the code below doesn't make a lot of sense:</p>
<p>if(multipleResponses){<br /> xml.append("<response_lid ident = \"Q"+id+"\" rcardinality = \"Multiple\" rtiming = \"No\">\n");<br /> xml.append("<render_choice shuffle = \"Yes\" minnumber = \"1\" maxnumber = \"4\">\n");<br />}</p>
<p>In particular, the maxnumber attribute is just an arbitrary number, and so there needs to be a way for the user to specify this.</p> Bug #3974 (New): Saved parsed items do not show up in the Assessment Importer (in DataPackage wiz...https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/39742009-04-13T02:16:18ZJay Leeleejon20@msu.edu
<p>for Exam1 from Fall 2004, it does not show the parsed items after finshed the parsing. i parsed the exam 1 from 2004 without any problem. however, When I chose the menu " Save and Close", it does not save the parsed items. it does not close the parsing window.</p> Bug #3971 (New): The original PDF document does not open when you reopen parsed items under Data ...https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/39712009-04-10T17:35:49ZJay Leeleejon20@msu.edu
<p>After completed the parsing and saved it to local, if i open data package again and open the assessment items, which is menu under documetation, the original documetation does not show up. is it natural or something that we need to fix it?</p> Bug #3867 (New): adding question numberhttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/38672009-03-08T20:55:52ZJay Leeleejon20@msu.edu
<p>when we add question, is there any way we can assign the question number?</p> Bug #3748 (New): Undo doesn't work for image manipulation + other contextshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/37482009-01-13T21:58:17ZRyan McFallmcfall@hope.edu
<p>Dragging an image onto a question doesn't seem to work in terms of undo. The buttons become active, but they don't actually do anything.</p> Bug #3664 (New): Allow exception pages for header/footer selectionshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/36642008-11-13T12:06:02ZRyan McFallmcfall@hope.edu
<p>When the user deletes a selection of type header/footer, we should ask them whether they want to delete it on all pages, or just on that page.</p>
<p>This means we'll need to store an exception list, or to convert the header footer selection into individual selections. The second is probably easier to write, but potentially more annoying to the user if they subsequently want to delete all of the headers/footers.</p> Bug #3661 (New): Add ability to show bounding boxes around vector imageshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/36612008-11-13T11:54:15ZRyan McFallmcfall@hope.edu
<p>At this stage we won't attempt to auto-combine them, but we should at least be able to show where the vector images are so that users know what they are looking for.</p> Bug #3627 (New): May need way to select image from original document while editing questionshttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/36272008-11-12T11:45:21ZRyan McFallmcfall@hope.edu
<p>Consider page 3 of Exam3BS110s08dem.pdf, which has a food chain above question 6a. This food chain, unfortunately, seems to have been "drawn" completely with text. The line (probably hyphens) is included in choice (c) of question 5, but then the actual text of the food chain is included after choice (b) of question 6.</p>
<p>The text can be deleted, but then the food chain is not included at all.</p> Bug #3624 (New): Show details about active selection in SelectIndividualTexthttps://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/36242008-11-11T14:55:31ZRyan McFallmcfall@hope.edu
<p>Right now the notion of the current selection tool and information about the active selection are combined.</p>
<p>I think it would be better to have the "toolbar" containing selection tools at the top of this page, along with the "ignore this page" button. Then information about the active selection could be shown where the current tools are, allowing the type to be changed, and to give more information about the selection (such as the pattern for a pattern selection). In this case, we can use a combo box to display the type of selection in order to minimize the space required.</p>
<p>Some feedback from team members on this one would be helpful.</p>