Project

General

Profile

Actions

Support #6862

closed

UI Testing feedback from AHM 2015

Added by Lauren Walker about 7 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Target version:
Start date:
10/28/2015
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Bugzilla-Id:

Description

We had two testers who provided feedback the provenance and metadata display. Overall the feedback was positive. Here is are the notes taken during that feedback (from Rachel Volentine):

-Participants liked that the display was simple and clean.
-The Prov display was clear (one of the best displays they have seen)
-They did not think upload date was important. They wanted to know creation date.
-They wanted some sort of symbol or icon to indicate that they are more ancestors (an arrow or something?) but they did not want the display to become too busy
-They liked the idea of a tab system to indicate what information was available on the page. BUT they did not want the display to become busy/cluttered. Only do something if the display will stay clean.
-They thought there was a lot of scrolling and thought it would be easy to get lost on the page. Wanted a "jump" or "back to top" button to help navigate.
-Wanted date the data was created to be more prominent. Didn't really care about date uploaded or date of DOI
-When you click on the ancestor you see "view", which they expected to mean you would see the R script (or other object). Recommend changing the term to "preview" or other term to mean that you see metadata instead.
-They liked the idea of getting a preview of the ancestor data
-One participant said "That's really clean stuff to work with" and considered that to be a big reason to return to the site.
-They liked the plain English descriptions in prov
-They liked the MN branding in the search

No data to display

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF