Project

General

Profile

Bug #2619

Systematic error in determination of nominals

Added by Michael Lee almost 14 years ago. Updated almost 14 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Immediate
Assignee:
Category:
atlas
Target version:
Start date:
10/27/2006
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Bugzilla-Id:
2619

Description

Carya ovata Weakley ? Carya ovata nominal should be
Carya ovata Weakley < Carya ovata nominal.
Perhaps this error is because Carya ovata Weakley >= Carya ovata F and your code does not know what to do? We want the largest possible concept for a nominal concept, so because Carya ovata Weakley < Carya ovata FNA, Carya ovata Weakley < Carya ovata Nominal.

History

#1 Updated by Michael Lee almost 14 years ago

This bug is originally from "other ideas and observations from Peet and Weakley"

#2 Updated by Xianhua Liu almost 14 years ago

Not really. The reason is that there is relationship:

Carya ovata (Alan Weakley) < Carya ovata (FNA)

XIanhua

#3 Updated by Robert Peet almost 14 years ago

This is closely related to bug 2627. In both cases the key issue is that nominal concepts must be either > or = all other concepts based on the same name. In short, the routine that generated the nominal concepts has a bug such that we have ? or | relationships rather than the correct Weakley < nominal relationship. This needs to be fixed throughout the database of relationships.

#4 Updated by Xianhua Liu almost 14 years ago

fixed. same as 2627.

#5 Updated by Robert Peet almost 14 years ago

verified fixed

#6 Updated by Redmine Admin over 7 years ago

Original Bugzilla ID was 2619

Also available in: Atom PDF