Project

General

Profile

Bug #3609

subsampling typo? 11-C-309

Added by Michael Lee over 11 years ago. Updated over 11 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
DataFix
Target version:
Start date:
11/07/2008
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Bugzilla-Id:
3609

Description

011-0C-0309 is listed in a way in the file that I think the 20% and 10% subsample should be something else, but I'm not sure what exactly. Probably requires a look at the original datasheet.


Related issues

Blocks InfoVeg - Bug #3611: Newell R module = supersample?In Progress11/07/2008

History

#1 Updated by Michael Lee over 11 years ago

This is another Claire plot where the supersampling was split into an R module. Here, it is for all TREE species, presumably. Only trees are recorded in R.

Solution to this depends on the solution to 3611, which is the same weird issue.

#2 Updated by Michael Lee over 11 years ago

I change my mind. There is a diagram on the tree sheet showing the location of the supersample. It is clearly 2 m along the far side of module 1:

[MOD2][MOD1][2m super sample]
(diagram not to scale)

Therefore, I think the best solution is to move the supersample entirely to the module #1 and have module 2 be treated as 100% sample, and 1 as 120% supersample for trees only.

#3 Updated by Michael Lee over 11 years ago

This has been fixed, archive version 1.1.24

#4 Updated by Redmine Admin over 7 years ago

Original Bugzilla ID was 3609

Also available in: Atom PDF