Bug #3609
closedsubsampling typo? 11-C-309
0%
Description
011-0C-0309 is listed in a way in the file that I think the 20% and 10% subsample should be something else, but I'm not sure what exactly. Probably requires a look at the original datasheet.
Related issues
Updated by Michael Lee about 15 years ago
This is another Claire plot where the supersampling was split into an R module. Here, it is for all TREE species, presumably. Only trees are recorded in R.
Solution to this depends on the solution to 3611, which is the same weird issue.
Updated by Michael Lee about 15 years ago
I change my mind. There is a diagram on the tree sheet showing the location of the supersample. It is clearly 2 m along the far side of module 1:
[MOD2][MOD1][2m super sample]
(diagram not to scale)
Therefore, I think the best solution is to move the supersample entirely to the module #1 and have module 2 be treated as 100% sample, and 1 as 120% supersample for trees only.
Updated by Michael Lee about 15 years ago
This has been fixed, archive version 1.1.24