Bug #3609
closed
subsampling typo? 11-C-309
Added by Michael Lee over 15 years ago.
Updated over 15 years ago.
Description
011-0C-0309 is listed in a way in the file that I think the 20% and 10% subsample should be something else, but I'm not sure what exactly. Probably requires a look at the original datasheet.
This is another Claire plot where the supersampling was split into an R module. Here, it is for all TREE species, presumably. Only trees are recorded in R.
Solution to this depends on the solution to 3611, which is the same weird issue.
I change my mind. There is a diagram on the tree sheet showing the location of the supersample. It is clearly 2 m along the far side of module 1:
[MOD2][MOD1][2m super sample]
(diagram not to scale)
Therefore, I think the best solution is to move the supersample entirely to the module #1 and have module 2 be treated as 100% sample, and 1 as 120% supersample for trees only.
This has been fixed, archive version 1.1.24
Original Bugzilla ID was 3609
Also available in: Atom
PDF