Bug #961: Required Fields for VegBank -- show questionable ones - VegBank - Ecoinformatics Redmine

Actions

Copy link

Bug #961

closed

Required Fields for VegBank -- show questionable ones

Added by Michael Lee almost 22 years ago. Updated almost 20 years ago.

Status:

Resolved

Priority:

Normal

Assignee:

Robert Peet

Category:

misc

Target version:

1.1.0

Start date:

01/23/2003

Due date:

% Done:

Estimated time:

Bugzilla-Id:

961

Description

This bug is for Lee to show the PI's the fields in VegBank that are required
that may not need to be required. Attached are 2 lists that do that.

Files

Download all files

reqdFields_check_brief.csv (923 Bytes) reqdFields_check_brief.csv		Michael Lee, 01/23/2003 11:10 AM
reqdFields_check.csv (4.91 KB) reqdFields_check.csv		Michael Lee, 01/23/2003 11:11 AM
reqdFields.csv (23.8 KB) reqdFields.csv		Michael Lee, 01/23/2003 11:12 AM

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Michael Lee almost 22 years ago

the attachments of this bug are .csv files that are roughly viewable when
clicking them, otherwise can be saved and viewed in Excel or 1-2-3. The
essential issues are: If a user has no cover (only stems), then s/he has no
autoTaxonCover or cover method, etc. Similarly, if a user has no strata
observed, then no stratumMethod should be specified. Also, if plot is public,
there is no confidentialityReason; "plotless" plots (unbounded) will have no
area.

This bug should be reassigned to farrell after PI's have decided which fields
should stay required and which should be moved to non-required. then Farrell
changes db implementation to allow plots without the field(s) that have changed
to non-required (nulls=yes).

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Michael Lee over 21 years ago

this has been fixed with questionable field going to non-required
(nulls=yes). A list of business rules has been started to cover the bulk of
the situations, which should have most of the fields as required.

Actions

Copy link