Bug #1152
closeddatetime element does not use consistent naming
0%
Description
The datetime element in eml-attribute should be spelled dateTime to be
consistent with the other dateTime elements and types. we may not be able to
fix this in eml2 because it will break backwards compatibility.
Related issues
Updated by Matt Jones over 20 years ago
This is a relatively minor issue, and I think that it is not worth breaking
backwards compatibility to fix it. I'm retargeting this at the 2.1 milestone,
which is when we might break some backwards compatibility and so should consider
fixing it then. I'm not sure it is worth fixing it at all, because it will only
mean that people have to map the "datetime" element to "dateTime".
Updated by Matt Jones over 19 years ago
Changing QA contact to the list for all current EML bugs so that people can
track what is happening.
Updated by Margaret O'Brien over 15 years ago
targeting for 2.1.0, although may drop back to unspecified.
Updated by Margaret O'Brien over 15 years ago
declaration of datetime element in attribute.xsd is now dateTime:
<xs:element name="dateTime">
to be consistent with the other uses of this term in EML (dateTimeDomain, dateTimeFormat)