Bug #336
closedneed formal defs for responsible party roles
0%
Description
Need formal definitions for the responsible party roles that is usable by
applications like morpho to help guide the user in their choice of roles.
There's a lot of confusion about several roles, like
originator/owner/principalInvestigator.
Related issues
Updated by Matt Jones almost 23 years ago
This should be done with the rest of the EML documentation review as found in
bug # 338.
Updated by Matt Jones almost 23 years ago
Chnaging target milestone for the major EML bugs to Beta7, which is scheduled
for early to mid March for release. There are likely other bugs that need to be
entered and resolved for this Beta7 release as well, so lets generate a complete
list!
Updated by Matt Jones almost 23 years ago
I think we need to carefully consider this list, and possibly revise it. We
originally chose it to correspond to the ISO role codes, but what is important
is that the various roles are 1) understandable, 2) exclusive (more or less),
and 3) comprehensive. If they can't be comprehensive, then we need to consider
making it an extensible domain instead of constraining it to these values.
No matter what we need to precisely define each of the roles that we decide to keep.
Updated by Matt Jones over 22 years ago
This list is now not part of the standard ResponsibleParty. It has been kept in
case some elements want to create a role element. It has been extended so that,
in addition to the enumerated values, any string can also be provided. We still
may want to consider removing it alltogether.
Updated by Matt Jones over 22 years ago
List has been kept, and the list is just a set of suggested terms, but the user
is free to put anything in the role elements. The important roles have been
broken out as individual elements. FIXED.