Track down the performance issue of metacat query.
Matt queried knb with the word "water". It took one minute and half. We need to figured out why it so slow.
#2 Updated by ben leinfelder over 10 years ago
the indexPaths are all present in metacat.properties.
These are what the main KNB page are searching with:
Plus these duplicates:
#3 Updated by ben leinfelder over 10 years ago
Running the same simple search ("water") on http://dev2.nceas.ucsb.edu/knb returns in a reasonable (tens of seconds) amount of time -- this using the "default" skin. 20117 records returned.
There does not appear to be caching of repeated search results on the KNB - subsequent searches can take as long as the initial one, but sometimes not.
I also triggered a nagios alert ("swap usage") when running these simple queries.
#4 Updated by Margaret O'Brien over 10 years ago
I routinely get a timeout (or equivalent?) when querying the LNO or KNB production metacats, on indexed fields. Queries speed up on retries, presumably because they are cached.
Obviously, I cant use the same query statements on both metacats, because they are not indexed the same. But you can have my scripts to play with as you please.
#5 Updated by ben leinfelder over 10 years ago
With all production data transfered to our new staging server (http://knb-mn-stage-1.dataone.org/knb) a search for "water" was indeed cached after the initial search (~ 5 seconds to return and start transferring 20705 data packages).
An initial search for "earth" returned 16235 records in ~16 seconds.
So it looks like this server is doing pretty well.
#6 Updated by ben leinfelder over 10 years ago
There seems to be renewed concern that this is not resolved.
During the Kepler/sensor workshop Matt reported query performance issues when ~25 people were concurrently searching for 'Insects' via the Kepler data search interface.
His search finally completed in ~30 minutes during which time the server load was very high and nagios sent many emails warning such.
While the search index should have been utilized, I can see that for truly concurrent searches on 'Insects' if all of the queries were started before the first one finished (when the query results are cached by Metacat) then ALL of the individual queries would run concurrently and never be able to make use of the cached results.
I can write a multi-thread test that launches long-running queries on a test Metacat and see what kind of results we get on different servers. I don't think running it against production KNB is the best thing, but there are DataONE servers that have a similar amount of KNB data on them that will be useful. They are, however, running Metacat 2.0 so won't be a true reflection of current behavior, only of what's to come with the next release.
#7 Updated by ben leinfelder over 10 years ago
I wrote a small test that issues the same Metacat query to a given server with parallel threads (25 for this example). Using the same query that Kepler would issue, the query for "Insects" does take some time, but not a half hour.
These are in ms:
query: 0 took: 315384
query: 1 took: 322531
query: 2 took: 305548
query: 3 took: 308005
query: 4 took: 315377
query: 5 took: 315468
query: 6 took: 304509
query: 7 took: 315469
query: 8 took: 317498
query: 9 took: 315381
query: 10 took: 316663
query: 11 took: 305278
query: 12 took: 317429
query: 13 took: 306272
query: 14 took: 315357
query: 15 took: 318126
query: 16 took: 315469
query: 17 took: 315343
query: 18 took: 306331
query: 19 took: 304750
query: 20 took: 305546
query: 21 took: 315555
query: 22 took: 308002
query: 23 took: 322503
query: 24 took: 315374
#8 Updated by ben leinfelder over 10 years ago
Running the same query (well, with "Insect" (not plural) so the results were not cached) with 50 threads makes this problem crop up.
The threads took about 22 minutes to return and we got a nagios warning about load ("check-mk").
Thinking about how Kepler performs the data query, I think each different metadata type (EML version) that it searches uses a different query thread. So each Kepler client was probably launching 2-3 queries which puts the demo workshop at around 75 concurrent Metacat queries.
Question is...what to do about it now?
#10 Updated by ben leinfelder over 9 years ago
Moving this along with the 2.1 bugs because we are still supporting old Metacat query. We do want people to start using SOLR-based query when we make it available, however, and we may just have to ignore this bug in order to implement the newer faster query mechanism.