Activity
From 04/09/2008 to 05/08/2008
04/23/2008
- 01:27 PM Bug #3232: EML parser limitations
- With regard to comment #3 (2 failed docs):
1. the first test shows how many 201 docs will fare when validated agains... - 12:24 PM Bug #3232: EML parser limitations
- Regarding Comment #2 about not neededing the EML Parser, I disagree. A valid EML document requires more than just sc...
- 12:17 PM Bug #3232: EML parser limitations
- These are two tests were to see if the older versions of eml.2.0.1 would validate with the newer version. Very simple...
04/22/2008
- 10:49 AM Bug #3232: EML parser limitations
- I'm concerned that a requirement to rewrite the parser first will significantly impede the release of 2.1.0. Obvious...
04/17/2008
- 11:41 AM Bug #3232: EML parser limitations
- If the EML Parser can be made to check additional schema validity constraints, we should go ahead and fix this for th...
- 11:32 AM Bug #3232 (Closed): EML parser limitations
- This is just for the record. It seems that the EML parser could benefit from an update, although it's current behavi...
- 10:37 AM Bug #3229: gRing is declared as GRingPointType
- This seems to have gotten duplicated.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 3227 *** - 10:37 AM Bug #3227: gRing is declared as GRingPointType
- *** Bug 3229 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
04/16/2008
- 04:28 PM Bug #3229 (Resolved): gRing is declared as GRingPointType
- There was a short email exchange on the LTER best-practices mailing list about some confusion in the coverage schema,...
- 04:25 PM Bug #3227: gRing is declared as GRingPointType
- Yes, this is a bug and is basically unusable in its current state. Changing the type definition as you suggest would...
- 04:08 PM Bug #3227 (Resolved): gRing is declared as GRingPointType
- There was a short email exchange on the LTER best-practices mailing list about some confusion in the coverage schema,...
Also available in: Atom