Actions
Bug #1063
closedreview and summarize workflow languages
Start date:
05/20/2003
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
Bugzilla-Id:
1063
Description
Need a review of the features and issues associated with the various workflow
languages under consideration. This should turn into a recommendation of one of
the languages for use in SEEK. The current languages that should be examined
include:
MoML, DPML, PMML, VDL/Chimera, XPDL, and Monarch's Pipeline language
Some issues to consider in the review:
1) flexibility for representing workflows (e.g., cycles)
2) support for data typing, extension to semantic typing
3) support for multiple execution models
4) static representation in open (e.g., text) format
Please summarize findings here.
Updated by Matt Jones almost 20 years ago
Using MoML by default as it works in Ptolemy. Still have room for a more
expressive syntax, but for now this review is not necessary.
Actions