Project

General

Profile

Bug #1063

review and summarize workflow languages

Added by Matt Jones over 18 years ago. Updated over 17 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Immediate
Category:
ams
Target version:
Start date:
05/20/2003
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Bugzilla-Id:
1063

Description

Need a review of the features and issues associated with the various workflow
languages under consideration. This should turn into a recommendation of one of
the languages for use in SEEK. The current languages that should be examined
include:
MoML, DPML, PMML, VDL/Chimera, XPDL, and Monarch's Pipeline language

Some issues to consider in the review:
1) flexibility for representing workflows (e.g., cycles)
2) support for data typing, extension to semantic typing
3) support for multiple execution models
4) static representation in open (e.g., text) format

Please summarize findings here.

History

#1 Updated by Matt Jones over 17 years ago

Using MoML by default as it works in Ptolemy. Still have room for a more
expressive syntax, but for now this review is not necessary.

#2 Updated by Redmine Admin over 8 years ago

Original Bugzilla ID was 1063

Also available in: Atom PDF