Project

General

Profile

Bug #471

eml spec overview document

Added by Matt Jones over 18 years ago. Updated almost 18 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Immediate
Assignee:
Category:
eml - general bugs
Target version:
Start date:
04/15/2002
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Bugzilla-Id:
471

Description

Need an overview document that gives the background and rationale for eml. This
would likely have both normative and non-normative sections. Would include an
overview of the structure of EML and the rationale for that structure, and its
intended use. Descriptes packaging and triples in detail. Probably would have
a normative appendix that defines the semantics of every field, which could be
auto-generated from the XSD source documentation.

Chris -- you started an outline for this. Can you recreate it here or in a
document in CVS?

We should have this for the 2.0.0 release but will not likely have it for the
beta7 release.

History

#1 Updated by Matt Jones over 18 years ago

At SEV meeting decided that Chris and David would be responsible for this
document for the beta9 release.

#2 Updated by Matt Jones over 18 years ago

Adding Chad to the list of contributors to this document.

#3 Updated by Matt Jones over 18 years ago

A prototype has been developed, but need to refine this as the spcification
document for the release. Changing milestone.

#4 Updated by Matt Jones about 18 years ago

Much progress made, but revisions still required for EML 2.0.0. Changing milestone.

#5 Updated by Chris Jones about 18 years ago

Moving the spec document milestone to the 2.0.0 release. There are a number of
structural changes that need to be made to this document, as well as content
changes.

1) Chapter's 1 and 3 have too much overlap, and so need to be reconciled.

2) The entire document needs to be formatted with section and sub-section
numbering for easier referencing

3) Example graphics are needed to get the concepts across

#6 Updated by James Brunt about 18 years ago

I've got David scheduled to work on this and I would like to work on it as well
- perhaps we could chat and divy up the pieces - James

#7 Updated by Matt Jones almost 18 years ago

Completed the spec. Its GREEAAAAT! :-) Any further issues with the spec
should be brought up in their own bug specifically describing the issue that
needs to be resolved. RESOLVED FIXED.

#8 Updated by Redmine Admin over 7 years ago

Original Bugzilla ID was 471

Also available in: Atom PDF