Bug #2666
openready for DBA: Project 76 (Elizabeth City, NC): 52 plots
Added by Michael Lee over 17 years ago. Updated over 15 years ago.
0%
Description
this data needs to be processed and added to the (v2006) central archive
(Forbes writing:)
For now, I would suggest that you use plots from Project 75 and 76 for error
checking. These plots have been "hand-checked" as precisely as possible
last week to avoid any major hang ups on your end.
They can be found at:\\Bioark\peetlab\CVS\CVS_Projects\76_2006B-ElizabethCity\CVS_EEP_DataEntry_v
20_Project76
Related issues
Updated by Michael Lee about 17 years ago
imported into new data entry tool version 2.1.0
ignored 2 errors about height range and total cover missing for strata
ignored 1 X-axis missing error
fixed one plot that had stems on module 2 which was the same as module R.
ignored plots without stems (15)
fixed one plot that used "S" stratum but they meant "Aquatic submerged" not shrub.
8 ERRORS REMAIN:
5 location accuracy values are missing, though the max for the project is 50, which we could fill in (76-02-1024,76-02-1028,76-04-1030,76-06-1025,76-06-1026)
2 stems have no info about them on 1-1030 (Arun. tecta, mod 9 and Q. laurifolia, also mod 9) -- herb team found Arundinaria on mod 9, but not Quercus laurifolia, though it was on the plot.
1 stem has no info on 4-1030 (Decumaria barbara , also mod 9) - could we assume one tiniest size stem? herb team found it on same mod.
Updated by Forbes Boyle about 17 years ago
(In reply to comment #1)
imported into new data entry tool version 2.1.0
ignored 2 errors about height range and total cover missing for strata
WHICH PLOTS ARE THESE?? "FB"
ignored 1 X-axis missing error WHICH PLOT IS THIS?? "FB"
fixed one plot that had stems on module 2 which was the same as module R.
ignored plots without stems (15)
fixed one plot that used "S" stratum but they meant "Aquatic submerged" not
shrub.8 ERRORS REMAIN:
5 location accuracy values are missing, though the max for the project is 50,
which we could fill in (76-02-1024, 76-02-1028,76-04-1030,76-06-1025,76-06-1026)
76-02-1024 = 10 m
76-02-1028 = 50 m
76-04-1030 = 50 m
76-06-1025 = 10 m
76-06-1026 = 10 m
"FB"
2 stems have no info about them on 1-1030 (Arun. tecta, mod 9 and Q.
laurifolia, also mod 9) -- herb team found Arundinaria on mod 9, but not
Quercus laurifolia, though it was on the plot.
MAJOR ERROR---THERE WAS AN ENTIRE LINE SKIPPED IN THE STEM ENTRY FOR MODULE 9 OF THIS PLOT. I HAVE FIXED THE ERROR IN THE ENTRY DATA BASE FILE: \\Bioark\peetlab\CVS\CVS_Projects\76_2006B-ElizabethCity\76-Data_v210
IS THIS OUR COPY OF RECORD LOCATION??? "FB"
I ADDED QUERCUS LAURIFOLIA TO MODULE 9 (1311), ASSUMING THIS SPECIES WAS OVERLOOKED BY THE COVER DATA RECORDERS BUT OBSERVED BY THE WOODY STEM RECORDERS.
"FB"
1 stem has no info on 4-1030 (Decumaria barbara , also mod 9) - could we
assume one tiniest size stem? herb team found it on same mod.
YES. I MADE THE CHANGE. "FB"
Updated by Michael Lee about 17 years ago
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
imported into new data entry tool version 2.1.0
ignored 2 errors about height range and total cover missing for strata
WHICH PLOTS ARE THESE?? "FB"
ML: I can't access Elymus now to access this data, as PEL is logged in,
but you can "View errors" from the Data Entry tab to see what errors there are.
When I say "ignore" I don't mean the Entry tool's ignore function, I just
left the error there.
ignored 1 X-axis missing error WHICH PLOT IS THIS?? "FB"
ML: ditto as above
fixed one plot that had stems on module 2 which was the same as module R.
ignored plots without stems (15)
fixed one plot that used "S" stratum but they meant "Aquatic submerged" not
shrub.8 ERRORS REMAIN:
5 location accuracy values are missing, though the max for the project is 50,
which we could fill in (76-02-1024, 76-02-1028,76-04-1030,76-06-1025,76-06-1026)76-02-1024 = 10 m
76-02-1028 = 50 m
76-04-1030 = 50 m
76-06-1025 = 10 m
76-06-1026 = 10 m
"FB"
ML: I can fill these in when I next log into project 76.
2 stems have no info about them on 1-1030 (Arun. tecta, mod 9 and Q.
laurifolia, also mod 9) -- herb team found Arundinaria on mod 9, but not
Quercus laurifolia, though it was on the plot.MAJOR ERROR---THERE WAS AN ENTIRE LINE SKIPPED IN THE STEM ENTRY FOR
MODULE 9 OF THIS PLOT. I HAVE FIXED THE ERROR IN THE ENTRY DATA BASE FILE:
\\Bioark\peetlab\CVS\CVS_Projects\76_2006B-ElizabethCity\76-Data_v210
IS THIS OUR COPY OF RECORD LOCATION??? "FB"
ML: Yes, it is. Thanks for fixing that. This is certainly the type thing
that should have been caught in the hand-error checking, but nothing's perfect.
I ADDED QUERCUS LAURIFOLIA TO MODULE 9 (1311), ASSUMING THIS SPECIES WAS
OVERLOOKED BY THE COVER DATA RECORDERS BUT OBSERVED BY THE WOODY STEM
RECORDERS.
"FB"
ML: agreed. There will be more issues like this, I suspect. I guess you
really filled in 1313, not 1311??
1 stem has no info on 4-1030 (Decumaria barbara , also mod 9) - could we
assume one tiniest size stem? herb team found it on same mod.YES. I MADE THE CHANGE. "FB"
ML: great. We could add in the notes that we did this, I suppose for that row.
I think the only errors remaining now are location accuracy, which I can't fill in at the moment, but will when I get to the databases next.
Updated by Michael Lee about 17 years ago
Data errors have been resolved. Moving on to DBA process and Spp check.
Updated by Michael Lee over 15 years ago
milestone revamping requires moving bugs to milestones that are in the future
Updated by Michael Lee over 15 years ago
the data prep bugs are waiting on taxonomic IDs before we can migrate, so I am marking these as things I'm not currently working on.