Activity

From 03/31/2005 to 04/29/2005

02:28 PM Bug #2054: use of <any> in additionalMetadata is invalid: Matt's suggestion to create a <metadata> element seems OK to me - it's just as
easy as any of the others to retrofit ... James Brunt
02:08 PM Bug #2054: use of <any> in additionalMetadata is invalid: I don't know how many use this feature, but the design was specifically done
that way to allow one metadata snippet t... Matt Jones
02:00 PM Bug #2054: use of <any> in additionalMetadata is invalid: addendum to Sid's comment #1
Currently, it's the eml-access documentation that shows multiple describes, and
it's not... Margaret O'Brien
12:24 PM Bug #2054: use of <any> in additionalMetadata is invalid: <additionalMetadata> is already unbounded though so making <describes>
required and solo seems the best option. Woul... James Brunt
12:10 PM Bug #2054: use of <any> in additionalMetadata is invalid: Actually 1 might not be best choice as Margaret told me that EML best practices
document recommends using multiple ... Saurabh Garg
12:03 PM Bug #2054 (Resolved): use of <any> in additionalMetadata is invalid: Johnoel from Hawaii also reported the same problem which Margaret reported
earlier while using latest version of XM... Saurabh Garg

Also available in: Atom

EML